In a workshop day with a fantastic group of educators, there was a comment on how to differentiate for our “high, mid, and low students.”  This language is something that I have used before because when looking at what we teach, it is easy to fall into this trap.
    If we look at who we teach, what we should realize that ALL of our students (as well as adults) are high, mid, and low, in different areas of life.  If we look to find the “high” areas in all of our students, the “lows” have a stronger potential of becoming better.
    If you were to come to work each day and were categorized as either “high, mid, or low,” it might not be a place where you would feel comfortable being on a regular basis.  On the other hand, if you worked in a place that went looking and building on your areas of strength, and felt valued, and supported in growing your areas of weakness, you would probably be more eager to be present, daily.
    A little rule that I try to follow when thinking about education. If we wouldn’t want something done to us as adults, we probably shouldn’t do it to our students.

    Tags:

    • Show Comments (0)

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    comment *

    • name *

    • email *

    • website *

    Ads

    You May Also Like

    Being a Void that is Felt

    We talk often about the importance of “collaboration”,  but talking about the impact of ...

    Finding and Unleashing Talent

    I was having an interesting conversation with a principal recently, and she had wondered ...

    Amazed, Inspired and Happy

    In a week where I have spent the majority of the time working with ...

    Finding the Good Problems

    Working with a group of administrators in a workshop, the participants seemed to be ...

    Lead For the Job You Want

    In Alberta, we have a document for leaders titled, “The Principal Quality Practice Guideline“, ...